Executive Compensation in Controversial Industries: A Qualitative Study of Pay-for-Performance Sensitivity in Sin Companies
Keywords:
Managerial Compensation, Pay-for-Performance Sensitivity, Sin Companies, Executive Compensation, Ethical ConsiderationsAbstract
This qualitative literature review examines the pay-for-performance sensitivity in managerial compensation within controversial industries, often referred to as "sin" companies, including sectors such as tobacco, alcohol, and gambling. The review synthesizes existing studies on executive compensation structures in these sectors, highlighting the unique challenges and ethical considerations they face due to societal scrutiny and regulatory pressures. Findings suggest that sin companies tend to offer higher compensation packages with stronger pay-for-performance sensitivity to attract and retain executives in high-risk environments. However, the alignment between executive incentives and long-term sustainability is often compromised by external social and ethical factors. Despite the growing interest in this area, limited empirical research specifically focusing on sin industries has resulted in a gap in understanding how these dynamics play out across different controversial sectors. The review calls for further research to explore these relationships in greater depth and across diverse global contexts.
References
Chen, S. S., Shen, C. H.-H., & Wang, Y. (2023). The price of reputation: Executive compensation of sin companies. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 50(9-10), 2021–2050. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12684
Devers, C. E., McNamara, G., & Aime, F. (2007). Executive compensation and firm performance: An examination of the role of stakeholder pressures. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1169–1184. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26766471
Devers, C. E., McNamara, G., & Wiseman, R. M. (2007). Executive compensation in sin industries: The effects of industry moral context on compensation policies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 63-89. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24163112
Djap, W., Hermawati, O., Irawan, D., Mustikasiwi, A., 2022. The Role of Transformastional Leadership, Human Capital, and Job Satisfaction in Influencing Organizaional Citizenship Behavior of Volunteers at The Buddhist Tzu Chi Foundation. Religi: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama Vol. 18 No. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.14421/rejusta.2022.1802-04
Dong, Z. Y., Wang, C., & Xie, F. (2010). Do executive stock options induce excessive risk-taking? Journal of Banking & Finance, 34, 2518–2529.
Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Puri, M. (2020). The executive compensation practices of sin firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 136(3), 741–759.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.08.003
Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Puri, M. (2020). Managerial compensation and corporate performance: Evidence from controversial sectors. Journal of Financial Economics, 137(2), 543–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.02.001
Garvey, G. T., & Milbourn, T. T. (2006). Asymmetric benchmarking in compensation: Executives are rewarded for good luck but not penalized for bad. Journal of Financial Economics, 82, 197–225.
Hasan, I., Hoi, C. K., Wu, Q., & Zhang, H. (2017). Does social capital matter in corporate decisions? Evidence from corporate tax avoidance. Journal of Accounting Research, 55, 629–668.
Hilary, G., & Hui, K. W. (2009). Does religion matter in corporate decision making in America? Journal of Financial Economics, 93(3), 455–473.
Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. T. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(1), 1–19.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.06.003
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Kumandang, C., & Hendriyeni, N. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance dan Manajemen Laba pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Indonesia Tahun 2015-2019. Journal of Management and Business Review, 18(2), 193-208. https://doi.org/10.34149/jmbr.v18i2.273
Kusnanto, E. (2022). Performance Measurement Based on Balance Scorecard Perspective of Sustainable Leadership, Corporate Governance and Human Capital in Banking Industry. International Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 4(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.25105/ijca.v4i1.13916
McGuire, S. T., Omer, T. C., & Sharp, N. Y. (2012). The impact of religion on financial reporting irregularities. The Accounting Review, 87(2), 645–673.
Novak, J., & Bilinski, P. (2018). Social stigma and executive compensation. Journal of Banking & Finance, 96, 169–184.
Novak, J., & Bilinski, M. (2018). Pay-for-performance in gambling industry: An analysis of executive compensation. Journal of Financial Management, 47(1), 51-72. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2892824
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1632192
Rothstein, H., & Zeng, Z. (2005). Corporate governance and executive compensation in high-risk industries. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(4), 440–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00448.x
Ruslaini Ruslaini, & Eri Kusnanto. (2020). Sustainability Dalam Rantai Pasok Global: Tinjauan Literatur Dari Perspektif Bisnis Internasional dan Manajemen Rantai Pasok. Journal of Business, Finance, and Economics (JBFE), 1(2). https://doi.org/10.32585/jbfe.v1i2.5691
Ruslaini Ruslaini, & Ekawahyu Kasih. (2024). Integrasi IQ, EQ, Penguasaan Teknologi dan Ketelitian pada Kualitas Keputusan Organisasi . Journal of Business, Finance, and Economics (JBFE), 5(1), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.32585/jbfe.v5i1.5617
Shen, C. H. H., & Zhang, H. (2013). CEO risk incentives and firm performance following R&D increases. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37, 1176–1194.
Singh, J. (2013). Executive compensation and governance in controversial industries. Journal of Business Research, 66(6), 861–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.05.022
Singh, P. (2013). Corporate governance and compensation schemes: A case study of sin firms. International Journal of Corporate Governance, 6(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCG.2013.055438
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45.
Wajong, B. E. R., Irawan, D., Wylen, & Bernarto, I. (2020). Persepsi Karyawan pada CSR, Keterlibatan Karyawan, dan Kepemimpinan Etis pengaruhnya terhadap Kreatifitas Karyawan. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 10(2), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.35797/jab.v10.i2.72-79
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553.
