Navigating Ethical Dilemmas in Supply Chain Management: Insights from Practitioners

Authors

  • A Sigit Pramono Hadi STIE Kasih Bangsa
  • Cahyatih Kumandang STIE Kasih Bangsa
  • Ruslaini Ruslaini STIE Kasih Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70142/ijbge.v1i2.187

Keywords:

Ethical decision-making, Supply chain management, Industry practitioners

Abstract

This qualitative research study delves into the complex landscape of ethical decision-making within supply chain management, drawing insights directly from industry practitioners. With a focus on identifying, analyzing, and navigating ethical dilemmas, the study employs in-depth interviews and thematic analysis to elucidate the multifaceted challenges faced by professionals in this field. Through rich narratives and thematic synthesis, the research explores the nuanced perspectives, strategies, and coping mechanisms employed by practitioners when encountering ethical conflicts. Findings underscore the significance of fostering a culture of transparency, accountability, and ethical awareness within supply chains. Furthermore, the study sheds light on the importance of proactive measures, collaborative approaches, and continuous dialogue in addressing ethical concerns effectively. The insights gleaned offer valuable implications for both theory and practice, contributing ing disto the ongocourse on ethics in supply chain management.

References

Banerjee, S. B. (2020). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Brennan, D., & Karapetrovic, S. (2019). Humanitarian logistics in the age of sustainability: A systematic literature review. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 9(2), 197-225.

Carter, C. R., & Jennings, M. M. (2004). The role of purchasing in corporate social responsibility: A structural equation analysis. Journal of Business Logistics, 25(1), 145-186.

Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360-387.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.

Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2005). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 695-727). Sage Publications.

Kolk, A. (2016). The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 23-34.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Sarkis, J. (2013). A boundaries and flows perspective of green supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(5), 520-531.

Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699-1710.

Published

2024-05-06

How to Cite

A Sigit Pramono Hadi, Cahyatih Kumandang, & Ruslaini Ruslaini. (2024). Navigating Ethical Dilemmas in Supply Chain Management: Insights from Practitioners. International Journal of Business Law, Business Ethic, Business Comunication &Amp; Green Economics, 1(2), 01–12. https://doi.org/10.70142/ijbge.v1i2.187

Most read articles by the same author(s)