Environmental Management Accounting and Sustainable Banking Performance: A Systematic Literature Review of Green Innovation, Contingency Factors, and Organizational Effectiveness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70142/kbijmaf.v3i3.472Keywords:
Environmental Management Accounting, Sustainable Banking Performance, Green Innovation, Contingency Factors, Organizational EffectivenessAbstract
This study presents a qualitative Systematic Literature Review (SLR) examining the role of Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) in enhancing Sustainable Banking Performance through Green Innovation, Contingency Factors, and Organizational Effectiveness. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, peer reviewed studies published in reputable international journals were systematically identified, screened, and synthesized. The review reveals that EMA has evolved into a strategic management accounting system that supports environmental decision-making, resource efficiency, ESG implementation, and sustainable finance. The findings indicate that Green Innovation strengthens the effectiveness of EMA by fostering sustainable financial products and operational improvements, while Contingency Factors including organizational size, environmental strategy, regulatory pressure, and managerial commitment influence successful EMA implementation. Furthermore, Organizational Effectiveness mediates the relationship between EMA and Sustainable Banking Performance by improving strategic capability, innovation, and operational efficiency. This review contributes an integrated conceptual understanding of sustainable banking and provides practical implications for managers, regulators, and policymakers seeking to advance sustainability-oriented banking practices.
References
Abdel-Kader, M., & Luther, R. (2008). The impact of firm characteristics on management accounting practices: A UK-based empirical analysis. The British Accounting Review, 40(1), 2–27.
Adomako, S., Ning, E., & Adu-Ameyaw, E. (2021). Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 422–431.
Agustia, D., Sawarjuwono, T., & Dianawati, W. (2019). The mediating effect of environmental management accounting on green innovation–firm value relationship. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(2), 299–306.
Amores-Salvadó, J., Martin-de Castro, G., & Navas-López, J. E. (2015). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 96, 288–297.
Ar, I. M. (2012). The impact of green product innovation on firm performance and competitive capability: The moderating role of managerial environmental concern. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 854–864.
Bartolomeo, M., Bennett, M., Bouma, J. J., Heydkamp, P., James, P., & Wolters, T. (2000). European Accounting Review, 9(1), 31–52.
Begum, S., Xia, E., Ali, F., Awan, U., & Ashfaq, M. (2022). Achieving green product and process innovation through green leadership and creative engagement in manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 33(4), 656–674.
Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 517–549.
Burritt, R. L., Hahn, T., & Schaltegger, S. (2002). Towards a comprehensive framework for environmental management accounting—links between business actors and environmental management accounting tools. Australian Accounting Review, 12(27), 39–50.
Cadez, S., & Guilding, C. (2008). An exploratory investigation of an integrated contingency model of strategic management accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(7–8), 836–863.
Chaidir, M., & Kasih, E. (2022). Peran Struktur Tata Kelola Internal dalam Meningkatkan Efisiensi Modal Intelektual di Perbankan Syariah. Al-Urban: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Dan Filantropi Islam, 6(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.22236/alurban_vol6.i2/17419
Chenhall, R. H. (2009). Accounting for the horizontal organization. In C. S. Chapman, A. G. Hopwood, & M. D. Shields (Eds.), Handbooks of Management Accounting Research (Vol. 3, pp. 1207–1233). Elsevier.
Christ, K. L., & Burritt, R. L. (2013). Environmental management accounting: The significance of contingent variables for adoption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 41, 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.007
Deb, B. C., Rahman, M. M., & Rahman, M. S. (2023). The impact of environmental management accounting on environmental and financial performance: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 19(3), 420–446.
Driessen, M. (2021). Sustainable finance: An overview of ESG in the financial markets. In D. Busch, G. Ferrarini, & S. Grünewald (Eds.), Sustainable Finance in Europe (pp. 329–350).
Fatica, S., Panzica, R., & Rancan, M. (2021). The pricing of green bonds: Are financial institutions special? Journal of Financial Stability, 54, 100873.
Ferreira, A., Moulang, C., & Hendro, B. (2010). Environmental management accounting and innovation: An exploratory analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), 920–948.
Flammer, C. (2021). Corporate green bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 499–516.
Gunarathne, N., Lee, K.-H., & Hitigala Kaluarachchilage, P. K. (2023). Tackling the integration challenge between environmental strategy and environmental management accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36(1), 63–95.
IFAC. (2005). International Guidance Document: Environmental Management Accounting.
Kusnanto, E. (2022). Performance Measurement Based on Balance Scorecard Perspective of Sustainable Leadership, Corporate Governance and Human Capital in Banking Industry. International Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 4(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.25105/ijca.v4i1.13916
Latan, H., Jabbour, C. J. C., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Wamba, S. F., & Shahbaz, M. (2018). Effects of environmental strategy, environmental uncertainty and top management’s commitment on corporate environmental performance: The role of environmental management accounting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180, 297–306.
Nguyen Kim Quoc, T., & Duong Thi Thuy, L. (2025). Factors affect bank performance under the mediator role of environmental management accounting: Evidence in Vietnam. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), 2526149.
Nguyen, A. H., Do, M. H. T., Hoang, T. G., & Nguyen, L. Q. T. (2023). Green financing for sustainable development: Insights from multiple cases of Vietnamese commercial banks. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 321–335.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Ruslaini Ruslaini, & Eri Kusnanto. (2020). Sustainability Dalam Rantai Pasok Global: Tinjauan Literatur Dari Perspektif Bisnis Internasional dan Manajemen Rantai Pasok. Journal of Business, Finance, and Economics (JBFE), 1(2).
https://doi.org/10.32585/jbfe.v1i2.5691
Sari, R. N., Pratadina, A., Anugerah, R., Kamaliah, K., & Sanusi, Z. M. (2021). Effect of environmental management accounting practices on organizational performance: Role of process innovation as a mediating variable. Business Process Management Journal, 27(4), 1296–1314.
Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2017). Contemporary Environmental Accounting: Issues, Concepts and Practice. Routledge.
Swalih, M. M., Ram, R., & Tew, E. (2024). Environmental management accounting for strategic decision-making: A systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(7), 6335–6367.
Weber, O. (2017). Corporate sustainability and financial performance of Chinese banks. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(3), 358–385.
