From Credit Lines to Customer Satisfaction: a Qualitative Review of FinTech Innovations in Small Business Financing

Authors

  • Dadang Irawan STIE Kasih Bangsa
  • Benardi Benardi STIE Kasih Bangsa
  • Seger Santoso STIE Kasih Bangsa
  • Sri Utami Nurhasanah STIE Kasih Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70142/kbijmaf.v1i4.236

Keywords:

FinTech Innovations, Small Business Financing, Credit lines, Customer Satisfaction, Digital Lending

Abstract

This qualitative literature review examines the impact of FinTech innovations on small business financing, focusing on credit lines and customer satisfaction. The review explores how FinTech platforms have transformed traditional lending by enhancing accessibility, efficiency, and flexibility for small businesses, particularly those underserved by traditional banks. Key findings show that FinTech innovations, such as the use of alternative data for credit assessment and automated risk management, have significantly improved customer experiences by offering faster, more tailored financial solutions. However, challenges remain, including regulatory concerns, the risk of algorithmic bias, the lack of personalized human interaction, and the potential for over-leveraging among small businesses. Despite these limitations, FinTech continues to evolve, offering promising avenues for improving financial inclusion and borrower experiences. The review concludes that while FinTech has positively influenced the small business financing landscape, further research is needed to address regulatory gaps and ensure the sustainable growth of digital lending systems.

References

Abritis, A., McCook, A., & Watch, R. (2017). Cash bonuses for peer-reviewed papers go global. Science. Retrieved from https://www.science.org/content/article/cash-bonuses-peer-reviewed-papers-go-global

Aguinis, H., & Gabriel, K. P. (2022). If you are serious about impact, create a personal impact development plan. Business & Society, 61, 818–826.

Aguinis, H., Archibold, E. E., & Rice, D. B. (2022). Let’s fix our own problem: Quelling the irresponsible research perfect storm. Journal of Management Studies, 59, 1628–1642. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2023.0198

Anderson, M. H., & Lemken, R. K. (2023). Citation context analysis as a method for conducting rigorous and impactful literature reviews. Organizational Research Methods, 26, 77–106.

Bartunek, J. M. (2020). What do, what did, and what should we do about “A’s?” Academy of Management Perspectives, 34, 164–169.

Beltran, J. R., Aguinis, H., Shuumarjav, Y., & Mercado, M. (2024). Putting scholarly impact in context: Implications for policymaking and practice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 38(3). https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2023.0198

Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (2006). A more complete conceptual framework for SME finance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(11), 2945-2966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.05.008

Berger, A. N., Goulding, W., & Rice, T. (2017). Do small businesses still prefer community banks? Journal of Banking & Finance, 77, 257-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.05.008

Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Sage.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Chen, M. A., Wu, Q., & Yang, B. (2019). How valuable is FinTech innovation? Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 2062-2106. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz017

Claessens, S., Frost, J., Turner, G., & Zhu, F. (2018). FinTech credit markets around the world: Size, drivers, and policy issues. BIS Quarterly Review, 19, 29-30.

Davis, M. (2020). FinTech and small business financing: A review of the literature. Small Business Economics, 54(3), 593-610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00150-2

de Roure, C., Pelizzon, L., & Thakor, A. V. (2019). P2P lenders versus banks: Cream skimming or bottom fishing? Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1933-1970.

Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., & Singer, D. (2017). Financial inclusion and FinTech: A global perspective. World Bank Research Observer, 32(1), 145-180.

Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152.

Frost, J. (2020). The economic forces driving FinTech adoption across countries. BIS Working Papers No. 838.

Gai, K., Qiu, M., & Sun, X. (2018). A survey on FinTech. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 13, 1-12.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.

Gomber, P., Koch, J. A., & Siering, M. (2018). Digital finance and FinTech: Current research and future research directions. Journal of Business Economics, 88(5), 537-580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-018-0915-9

Haddad, C., & Hornuf, L. (2019). The emergence of the global FinTech market: Economic and technological determinants. Small Business Economics, 53(1), 81-105.

Harzing, A. W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106, 787-804.

Jagtiani, J., & Lemieux, C. (2017). FinTech lending: Financial inclusion, risk pricing, and alternative information. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Working Paper, 17-17. https://doi.org/10.21799/frbp.wp.2017.17

Lambert, L. S., & Newman, D. A. (2023). Construct development and validation in three practical steps: Recommendations for reviewers, editors, and authors. Organizational Research Methods, 26, 574-607.

Mills, K. G., & McCarthy, B. Y. (2016). The state of small business lending: Innovation and technology and the implications for regulation. Harvard Business School Working Paper, 17-042. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2877201

Mingers, J., & Lipitakis, E. (2010). Counting the citations: A comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the field of business and management. Scientometrics, 85, 613-625.

Morse, A. (2019). FinTech: Background, market structure, and challenges. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 11, 75-100.

Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., & Britten, N. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. ESRC Methods Programme.

Ruslaini, D. N. (2024). A Global Review Of Cloud Computing Adoption In Small And Medium Enterprise. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 102(9).

Serrano-Cinca, C., Gutiérrez-Nieto, B., & Cuellar-Fernández, B. (2016). The use of profit scoring as an alternative to credit scoring systems in peer-to-peer lending. Decision Support Systems, 89, 113-122.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Zavolokina, L., Schou, P., & Schwabe, G. (2021). FinTech – What’s in a name? Digital innovation in financial services. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 63(1), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-020-00658-1

Zhang, X., Zhao, X., & Wang, H. (2021). How FinTech innovations improve customer satisfaction: Evidence from small business financing. Journal of Financial Innovation, 7(3), 121-139. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00267-8

Published

2024-10-14

How to Cite

Dadang Irawan, Benardi Benardi, Seger Santoso, & Sri Utami Nurhasanah. (2024). From Credit Lines to Customer Satisfaction: a Qualitative Review of FinTech Innovations in Small Business Financing. International Journal of Management, Accounting &Amp; Finance (KBIJMAF), 1(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.70142/kbijmaf.v1i4.236

Most read articles by the same author(s)