Assessing Intangible Assets and the Decrease in Earnings Clarity: A Review of Literature on the Impact of Mismatching

Authors

  • Ngadi Permana Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Kasih Bangsa
  • Yessica Amelia Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Kasih Bangsa
  • Farah Qalbia Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Kasih Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70142/ijbmel.v2i2.286

Keywords:

Intangible assets, Earnings informativeness, Accounting mismatching, Conservative accounting, Financial reporting reform

Abstract

This qualitative literature review examines the relationship between accounting for intangible assets, mismatching issues, and the declining informativeness of earnings. The findings reveal that traditional accounting frameworks inadequately address the growing significance of intangible assets, resulting in mismatching between revenues and expenses. Conservative accounting practices further exacerbate this issue by deferring the recognition of intangible-related expenditures, reducing the relevance of earnings as a decision-making tool. The review synthesizes insights from recent studies, highlighting the need for accounting reforms, such as the capitalization of certain intangible investments, to improve financial reporting accuracy. Furthermore, alternative metrics like adjusted earnings and advanced valuation models are discussed as potential solutions for mitigating mismatching effects. This study underscores the importance of evolving accounting standards to better reflect the economic realities of intangible asset-driven businesses.

References

Andronoudis, D., Dargenidou, C., Konstantinidi, E., & Pope, P. F. (2019). Conservative accounting and risk: The case of research & development [Unpublished paper]. Bocconi University.

Balachandran, S., & Mohanram, P. (2011). Is the decline in the value relevance of accounting driven by increased conservatism? Review of Accounting Studies, 16(2), 272–301.

Banker, R. D., Huang, R., & Natarajan, R. (2011). Equity incentives and long-term value created by SG&A expenditure. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(3), 794–830.

Barker, R., & Penman, S. (2020). Moving the conceptual framework forward: Accounting for uncertainty. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(1), 322–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12547

Barker, R., Lennard, A., Penman, S., & Teixeira, A. (2021). Accounting for intangible assets: Suggested solutions. Accounting and Business Research, 52, 601–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2020.1841521

Basu, S., Cready, W. M., & Paek, W. (2016). Measuring matching using reported revenues and expenses [Working paper]. Temple University, University of Texas at Dallas, and Sungkyunkwan University.

Benardi Benardi, Ngadi Permana, & Mohammad Chaidir. (2024). Dampak Keterlibatan Institusi Keuangan terhadap Sophistication Finansial dan Pengeluaran Konsumen . Jurnal Visi Manajemen, 10(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.56910/jvm.v10i2.555

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Bushman, R. M., Lerman, A., & Zhang, X. F. (2016). The changing landscape of accrual accounting. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(1), 41–78.

Chambers, D., Jennings, R., & Thompson, R. B. (2002). Excess returns to R&D-intensive firms. Review of Accounting Studies, 7(2–3), 133–158.

Ciftci, M., Lev, B., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2011). Is research and development mispriced or properly risk adjusted? Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 26(1), 81–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X11400580

Collins, D. W., Maydew, E. L., & Weiss, I. S. (1997). Changes in the value-relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00023-9

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dichev, I. D., & Tang, V. W. (2008). Matching and the changing properties of accounting earnings over the last 40 years. The Accounting Review, 83(6), 1425–1460. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.6.1425

Enache, L., & Srivastava, A. (2018). Should intangible investments be reported separately or commingled with operating expenses? New evidence. Management Science, 64(7), 3446–3468. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2756

Francis, J., & Schipper, K. (1999). Have financial statements lost their relevance? Journal of Accounting Research, 37(2), 319–352. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491412

Givoly, D., & Hayn, C. (2000). The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: Has financial reporting become more conservative? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(3), 287–320.

Hyung Il Oh, S., & Penman, S. (2024). Income statement mismatching has not reduced the informativeness of earnings over time. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 51(3–4), 756–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12759

Kumandang, C., Hendriyeni, N.S., 2021. Do awarded companies have fewer earnings management practices?. 1st Edition ISBN9781003196013: CRC Press.

Lev, B. (2001). Intangibles: Management, measurement, and reporting. Brookings Institution Press.

Lev, B. (2018). Intangibles [Unpublished paper]. New York University.

Lev, B., & Sougiannis, T. (1996). The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21(1), 107–138.

Lev, B., & Zarowin, P. (1999). The boundaries of financial reporting and how to extend them. Journal of Accounting Research, 37(2), 353–385. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491413

Muhammad Rizal, & Eri Kusnanto. (2021). Exploring The Challenges Of Implementing International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Journal of Business, Finance, and Economics (JBFE), 2(1). https://doi.org/10.32585/jbfe.v2i1.5684

Penman, S. H. (2023). Accounting for intangible assets: Thinking it through. Australian Accounting Review, 33(1), 5–13.

Penman, S., & Zhang, X. (2021). Reconciling conservatism and earnings informativeness. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(2), 763–791.

Ruslaini Ruslaini, & Ekawahyu Kasih. (2024). Integrasi IQ, EQ, Penguasaan Teknologi dan Ketelitian pada Kualitas Keputusan Organisasi . Journal of Business, Finance, and Economics (JBFE), 5(1), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.32585/jbfe.v5i1.5617

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

Tanti Sugiharti. (2022). Optimalisasi Siklus Manajemen Kinerja untuk Pengembangan Kepemimpinan di Organisasi. Journal of Business, Finance, and Economics (JBFE), 3(1), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.32585/jbfe.v3i1.5717

Wajong, B. E. R., Irawan, D., Wylen, & Bernarto, I. (2020). Persepsi Karyawan pada CSR, Keterlibatan Karyawan, dan Kepemimpinan Etis pengaruhnya terhadap Kreatifitas Karyawan. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 10(2), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.35797/jab.v10.i2.72-79

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-31

How to Cite

Ngadi Permana, Amelia, Y., & Qalbia, F. (2025). Assessing Intangible Assets and the Decrease in Earnings Clarity: A Review of Literature on the Impact of Mismatching. International Journal of Business, Marketing, Economics &Amp; Leadership (IJBMEL), 2(2), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.70142/ijbmel.v2i2.286