Understanding the Role of Gender Diversity in Leadership: A Qualitative Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70142/ijbmel.v1i2.194Keywords:
Gender Diversity, Leadership, Qualitative AnalysisAbstract
This qualitative study aims to explore the significance of gender diversity in leadership roles. Employing a qualitative research design, the study utilizes purposive sampling to select participants from various organizational contexts. Semi-structured interviews are conducted to gather in-depth insights into participants' perceptions and experiences regarding gender diversity in leadership. Thematic analysis is employed to identify patterns, themes, and meanings within the data. The findings reveal nuanced perspectives on the impact of gender diversity on leadership effectiveness, organizational culture, and decision-making processes. This study contributes to the existing literature by offering rich qualitative insights into the complex dynamics of gender diversity in leadership roles.
References
Berdahl, J. L., Cooper, J., Glick, P., Livingston, R. W., & Williams, J. C. (2020). Work as a Man: Hierarchical Boundary Heightens Gender Differences in Willingness to Commit to Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(3), 543–582.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Catalyst. (2019). The bottom line: Corporate performance and women's representation on boards. Catalyst.
Catalyst. (2020). Intersectionality matters: Engaging millennial women of color in the workplace. Catalyst.
Catalyst. (2021). Why diversity and inclusion matter: Quick take. Catalyst.
Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality's definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 1-20.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139-167.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
Dierckx, D., et al. (2017). A qualitative study of gender perceptions in management consulting. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(2), 307-323.
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Harvard Business Press.
Eagly, A. H., & Chin, J. L. (2010). Diversity and leadership in a changing world. American Psychologist, 65(3), 216-224.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573-598.
Francis, J. J., Johnston, M., Robertson, C., Glidewell, L., Entwistle, V., Eccles, M. P., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2010). What Is an Adequate Sample Size? Operationalising Data Saturation for Theory-Based Interview Studies. Psychological Health, 25(10), 1229–1245.
Guest, G., et al. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publications.
Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113-135.
Hekman, D. R., Johnson, S. K., Foo, M. D., & Yang, W. (2021). You're a What? The Role of Gender Identity in Experiencing Role Ambiguity and Reactions to Leader Behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 64(3), 858–888.
Johnson, S. K., & Saks, S. G. (2021). Reflecting on the Intersection of Diversity, Leadership, and Organizations: Moving from Theory to Practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(5), 101417.
Johnson, S. K., Murphy, S. E., & Zewdie, S. (2018). Maintaining a Sense of Inclusion and Authenticity on Multicultural Teams: The Role of Leader Values and Identity Work. Academy of Management Review, 43(4), 700–725.
Kalev, A., et al. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 589-617.
Kulik, C. T., & Ryan, S. (2019). Overcoming the Gender Gap: Can Organizations Leverage Male Employees’ Family Demands for the Benefit of All? Academy of Management Journal, 62(6), 1754–1784.
McKinsey & Company. (2018). Delivering through diversity. McKinsey & Company.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
Nishii, L. H., Lepak, D. P., & Schneider, B. (2018). Diversity at Work: The Practice of Inclusion. The Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 809–855.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544.
Palys, T. (2008). Purposive Sampling. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods (Vol. 2, pp. 697–698). Sage Publications.
Rosette, A. S., & Tost, L. P. (2019). Gender Role- and Gender Valence-Based Discrimination in Hierarchical Penalties: A Cross-Classified Model Approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 151, 103–117.
Smith, N. G., & Smith, V. A. (2020). How Gender Role Stereotypes Affect Leadership Formation in Emerging Economies: A Cross-National Comparison. Academy of Management Journal, 63(1), 166–188.
Smith, V. A., Vadera, A. K., & Tangirala, S. (2017). Seeing Clearly: The Impact of Socially Responsible Leaders on Employee Perceptions of Organizational Justice and Performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(5), 710–728.
Van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Routledge.
West, L. R., et al. (2019). When women lead: The visibility of women and the implications for organizational trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(4), 1129–1142.
World Economic Forum. (2020). Global gender gap report 2020. World Economic Forum.
