The Role of Risk Litigation in Merger and Acquisition (M&A) Valuation : An Overview Strategic in Opinion Fairness in Merger and Acquisition Transactions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70142/ijbge.v2i3.347Keywords:
Litigation Risk, M&A Valuation, Fairness Opinions, Agency Conflict, Regulatory ChangesAbstract
This qualitative literature review explores the role of litigation risk in merger and acquisition (M&A) valuations, focusing on fairness opinions. The study reveals that high litigation risk leads to lower valuations in target-sought fairness opinions, particularly in transactions with significant agency conflicts. Regulatory changes, such as those in Delaware, have increased awareness of litigation risks and influenced valuation strategies. The selection of peer firms for valuation is also affected by litigation risk, underscoring the importance of accurate peer selection. These findings provide valuable insights for academics, practitioners, and policymakers in managing litigation risk and maximizing value in M&A transactions. Limitations include reliance on existing literature and potential contextual differences across jurisdictions. Future research should empirically test these hypotheses and explore other jurisdictions to gain a comprehensive understanding of litigation risk in M&A valuations.
References
Bartell, R., et al. (2017). In Defense of Fairness Opinions . Duff and Phelps White Paper.
Bebchuk, L., et al. (1989). Fairness opinions: how fair are they and what can be done about it? Duke Law Journal .
Bhojraj, S., et al. (2002). Who is my peer? A valuation-based approach to the selection of comparable firms. Journal of Accounting Research.
Boone, A., et al. (2019). Merger negotiations in the shadow of judicial appraisal. Journal of Law and Economics .
Cain, M., et al. (2018). The shifting tides of merger litigation. Vanderbilt Law Review .
Callahan, S., et al. (2018). Appraisal arbitrage and shareholder value. Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting .
Eaton, G., et al. (2022). Peer selection and valuation in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics .
Imperatore, C., Pündrich , G., Verdi, R. S., & Yost, B. P. (2024). Litigation risk and strategic M&A valuations. Journal of Accounting and Economics , 78(1), 101671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2024.101671
Kisgen, D., et al. (2009). Are fairness opinions fair? The case of mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics .
Mohamad Chaidir , Benardi Benardi , & Seger Santoso. (2024). Corporate Governance in Acquisitions: Opportunities and Challenges. Indonesian Economic Review , 4(2), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.53787/iconev.v4i1.35
Officer, M. (2007). Are performance based arbitrage effects detectable? Evidence from merger arbitrage. Journal of Corporate Finance .
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Ruslaini Ruslaini , & Ekawahyu Kasih. (2024). Integration of IQ, EQ, Mastery Technology and Accuracy in Organizational Decision Quality . Journal of Business, Finance, and Economics (JBFE), 5(1), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.32585/jbfe.v5i1.5617
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research , 104, 333-339.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Stewart, C. (2023). Appraisal rights and corporate disclosure during mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Accounting and Economics .
Tranfield , D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management , 14(3), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly , 26(2), xiii-xxiii.
