Entrepreneurs as Pragmatic Experimenters: A Literature Review on Causal Inference, Feedback Interpretation, and Heuristic Adaptation in Uncertain Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70142/kbijmaf.v3i1.401Keywords:
Entrepreneurial learning, Causal inference, Heuristic adaptation, Feedback interpretation, UncertaintyAbstract
This literature review explores how entrepreneurs act as pragmatic experimenters when navigating uncertainty, focusing on three interrelated cognitive processes: causal inference, feedback interpretation, and heuristic adaptation. Drawing on recent empirical and theoretical studies, the review synthesizes how entrepreneurs learn through iterative experimentation, adjust mental models based on ambiguous feedback, and develop heuristics to guide decision-making in unpredictable environments. The findings suggest that entrepreneurial success is often linked to adaptive learning strategies rather than predictive accuracy. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of bounded rationality and cognitive flexibility in entrepreneurial contexts, offering insights for future inquiry into how entrepreneurs balance action and learning under uncertainty.
References
Agrawal, A., Gans, J. S., & Stern, S. (2021). Enabling entrepreneurial choice. Management Science, 67(9), 5510–5524. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3842
Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 11–26.
Alvarez, S. A., & Parker, S. C. (2009). Emerging firms and the allocation of control rights: A Bayesian approach. Academy of Management Review, 34(2), 209–227.
Alvarez, S. A., & Porac, J. (2020). Imagination, indeterminacy, and managerial choice at the limit of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 45(4), 735–744.
Arikan, A. M., Arikan, I., & Koparan, I. (2020). Creation opportunities: Entrepreneurial curiosity, generative cognition, and Knightian uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 45(4), 808–824.
Artinger, S., Petersen, M., Gigerenzer, G., & Weibler, J. (2015). Heuristics as adaptive decision strategies in management. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S33–S52. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1950
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311
Bingham, C. B., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2011). Rational heuristics: The “simple rules” that strategists learn from process experience. Strategic Management Journal, 32(13), 1437–1464.
Blank, S. (2013). Why the lean start‑up changes everything. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 63–72.
Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 9–30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(96)00003-1
Camuffo, A., Cordova, A., Gambardella, A., & Spina, C. (2020). A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Science, 66(2), 564–586.
Camuffo, A., Gambardella, A., Messinese, D., Novelli, E., Paolucci, E., & Spina, C. (2024). A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision‑making: Large‑scale replication and extension. Strategic Management Journal, 45(6), 1209–1237.
Cao, R., Koning, R. M., & Nanda, R. (2021). Biased sampling of early users and the direction of startup innovation. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28891
Csaszar, F. A., & Levinthal, D. A. (2016). Mental representation and the discovery of new strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 37(10), 2031–2049.
Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. (2021). Microfoundations of organizational adaptation: Routine development and the problem of scalability. Strategic Management Journal, 42(4), 708–741. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3232
Denrell, J., & Fang, C. (2010). Predicting the next big thing: Success as a signal of poor judgment. Management Science, 56(10), 1653–1667.
Dequech, D. (2011). Uncertainty: A typology and refinements of existing concepts. Journal of Economic Issues, 45(3), 621–640.
Dew, N., Sarasvathy, S. D., Read, S., & Wiltbank, R. (2009). Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: Differences between experts and novices. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 287–309.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.02.002
Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2006). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(1), 45–53.
https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819054308576
Ehrig, T., & Schmidt, J. (2021a). How strategists revise and reconcile theories about the future of their business. Strategy Science. Forthcoming.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995). Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 84–110. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393701
Eisenmann, T. R., Ries, E., & Dillard, S. (2012). Hypothesis-driven entrepreneurship: The lean startup (HBS Case 812-095). Harvard Business School.
Felin, T., Gambardella, A., & Zenger, T. (2020). Value lab: The science of entrepreneurial strategy. Management & Business Review, 2, 68–77.
Felin, T., Kauffman, S., Koppl, R., & Longo, G. (2020). Economic opportunity and evolution: Beyond landscapes and bounded rationality. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 14(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1356
Fisher, G. (2012). Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: A behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5), 1019–1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00537.x
Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2019). The context of entrepreneurial judgment: Organizations, markets, and institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 56(5), 1197–1213.
Gigerenzer, G., & Brighton, H. (2009). Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 107–143.
Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346
Grégoire, D. A., & Shepherd, D. A. (2012). Technology-market combinations and the identification of entrepreneurial opportunities: An investigation of the opportunity-individual nexus. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 753–785. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0126
Grégoire, D. A., Barr, P. S., & Shepherd, D. A. (2010). Cognitive processes of opportunity recognition: The role of structural alignment. Organization Science, 21(2), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0462
Hargadon, A., & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17(4), 484–500. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0200
Harrison, S. H., & Rouse, E. D. (2015). An inductive study of feedback interactions over the course of creative projects. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 375–404.
Haynie, J. M., Shepherd, D., & McMullen, J. S. (2010). An opportunity for me? The role of resources in opportunity evaluation decisions. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 337–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00824.x
Irawan, D., Prabowo, H., Kuncoro, E.A., Thoha, N. (2022). Operational Resilience as a Key Determinant of Corporate Sustainable Longevity in the Indonesian Jamu Industry. MDPI Journals Vol.14 No.11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116431.
Koning, R., Hasan, S., & Chatterji, A. (2019). Experimentation and start‑up performance: Evidence from A/B testing. Management Science, 68(10), 6434–6453.
Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. W., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151
Loock, M., & Hinnen, G. (2015). Heuristics in organizations: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 68(9), 2027–2036.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.02.016
Luan, S., Reb, J., & Gigerenzer, G. (2019). Ecological rationality: Fast‑and‑frugal heuristics for managerial decision making under uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 62(6), 1735–1759.
McCann, B. T., & Schwab, A. (2023). Bayesian analysis in strategic management research: Time to update your priors. Strategic Management Review, 4.
McMullen, J. S., & Dimov, D. (2013). Time and the entrepreneurial journey: The problems and promise of studying entrepreneurship as a process. Journal of Management Studies, 50(8), 1481–1512. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12049
Mohamad Chaidir, Grace Yulianti, & Benardi Benardi. (2024). Pengaruh Volatilitas Ekuitas dan Leverage terhadap Risiko Investasi. Jurnal Visi Manajemen, 10(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.56910/jvm.v10i1.556
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Politis, D. (2005). The process of entrepreneurial learning: A conceptual framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 399–424.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00091.x
Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Crown Publishing Group.
Ruslaini Ruslaini, & Ekawahyu Kasih. (2024). Integrasi IQ, EQ, Penguasaan Teknologi dan Ketelitian pada Kualitas Keputusan Organisasi. Journal of Business, Finance, and Economics (JBFE), 5(1), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.32585/jbfe.v5i1.5617
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378020
Shepherd, D. A., Williams, T. A., & Patzelt, H. (2015). Thinking about entrepreneurial decision making: Review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41(1), 11–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314541153
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature reviews as a research strategy: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(45). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative reviews of the literature: Methods and purposes. International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology, 7(3), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJAVET.2016070105
Yoon, J. (2022). Feedback resilience in entrepreneurial ventures: How entrepreneurs interpret and respond to adverse signals. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 17, e00319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2022.e00319
Zellweger, T., & Zenger, T. (2023). Entrepreneurs as scientists: A pragmatist approach to producing value out of uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 48(3). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2020.0503
