Akuntansi sebagai Infrastruktur Informasi Risiko: Sintesis Literatur atas Peran Prinsip Akuntansi dalam Model Faktor Harga Aset
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70142/studiaekonomika.v24i1.402Keywords:
Penetapan Harga Aset, Prinsip Akuntansi, Informasi Risiko, Aset Takberwujud, Model FaktorAbstract
Kajian literatur kualitatif ini mengeksplorasi bagaimana akuntansi berfungsi sebagai infrastruktur dasar informasi risiko dalam model faktor harga aset. Dengan merujuk pada studi terkini dalam akuntansi keuangan dan penetapan harga aset, sintesis ini menyoroti bagaimana prinsip-prinsip akuntansi—seperti pengukuran berbasis akrual, konservatisme, dan pengakuan aset takberwujud—membantu menjelaskan variasi silang dalam imbal hasil saham. Kajian ini membahas bagaimana laporan keuangan menyumbang pada berita arus kas (cash-flow news) maupun berita tingkat diskonto (discount-rate news), sehingga memperkuat peran akuntansi dalam membentuk ekspektasi pasar. Selain itu, variabel-variabel berbasis akuntansi terbukti dapat melengkapi atau bahkan menggantikan faktor risiko tradisional seperti dalam model Fama-French. Temuan ini menyiratkan bahwa integrasi informasi akuntansi ke dalam kerangka penetapan harga aset meningkatkan estimasi risiko, akurasi valuasi, dan kekuatan prediktif, khususnya dalam perekonomian yang semakin digerakkan oleh modal takberwujud
Downloads
References
Ball, R., Gerakos, J., Linnainmaa, J. T., & Nikolaev, V. V. (2018). Accruals, cash flows, and operating profitability in the cross section of stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 127(1), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.11.002
Ball, R., Gerakos, J., Linnainmaa, J. T., & Nikolaev, V. V. (2020). Earnings, retained earnings, and book-to-market in the cross section of expected returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 135(1), 231–254.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.06.004
Ball, R., Gerakos, J., Linnainmaa, J., & Nikolaev, V. (2018). Profitability, cash flows and accruals in the cross section of stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 121(1), 28–45.
Barker, R., Lennard, A., Penman, S., & Teixeira, A. (2021). Accounting for intangible assets: Suggested solutions. Accounting and Business Research, 52(5), 601–630.
Boell, S. K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2015). On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews in IS. Journal of Information Technology, 30(2), 161–173.
Bongaerts, D., Cremers, K. J. M., Goetz, M. R., & Nguyen, C. (2022). Intangible assets and the cross-section of stock returns. Review of Financial Studies, 35(12), 5597–5638. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhac016
Bongaerts, D., Cremers, M., Géczy, C., & Nguyen, D. (2022). Intangible capital and asset pricing. Review of Financial Studies. Advance online publication.
https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhac087
Bongaerts, D., Kang, X., & van Dijk, M. (2022). Intangible assets and the cross-section of returns. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3927990
Casey, R. J., Gao, F., Kirschenheiter, M. T., Li, S., & Pandit, S. (2016). Do Compustat financial statement data articulate? Journal of Financial Reporting, 1(1), 37–59.
Cho, T., Kremens, L., Lee, D., & Polk, C. (2024). Scale or yield? A present-value identity. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3857368
Cooper, M., Gulen, H., & Ion, M. (2024). The use of asset growth in empirical asset pricing models. Journal of Financial Economics, 151, 103746.
Danthine, J. P., & Jin, X. (2006). Intangible capital, factor substitutability, and growth. University of Lausanne Working Paper.
https://ideas.repec.org/p/chf/rpseri/rp0618.html
Danthine, J. P., & Jin, X. (2007). Productive intangible capital and economic growth. Economics Letters, 95(3), 484–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2006.10.014
Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2006). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(1), 45–53.
Duan, Z., Gong, Z., & Qi, Q. (2022). Factorization asset pricing. SSRN.
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3940074
Eisfeldt, A., & Papanikolaou, D. (2013). Organizational capital and the cross-section of expected returns. Journal of Finance, 67(4), 1365–1406.
Eisfeldt, A., Kim, E., & Papanikolaou, D. (2020). Intangible value. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3720983
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 1–22.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2018). Choosing factors. Journal of Financial Economics, 128(2), 234–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.02.012
Hou, K., Mo, H., Xue, C., & Zhang, L. (2021). An augmented q-factor model with expected growth. Review of Finance, 25(1), 1–41.
Hou, K., Xue, C., & Zhang, L. (2015). Digesting anomalies: An investment approach. Review of Financial Studies, 28(3), 650–705
Kleibergen, F., & Zhan, J. (2022). Factor models and weak identification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.13600. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.13600
Li, Y. (2025). The changing factor structure of stock returns: The rise of intangible investment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.16336. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16336
Mohamad Chaidir, Grace Yulianti, & Benardi Benardi. (2024). Pengaruh Volatilitas Ekuitas dan Leverage terhadap Risiko Investasi. Jurnal Visi Manajemen, 10(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.56910/jvm.v10i1.556
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13.
Oswald, D., Simpson, A., & Zarowin, P. (2020). The information benefits of R&D capitalization. SSRN.
Park, H. (2022). An intangible-adjusted book-to-market ratio still predicts stock returns. Critical Finance Review, 11, 265–297.
Park, J. (2022). The role of intangible assets in cross-sectional return prediction. Journal of Accounting Research, 60(3), 895–933. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12421
Penman, S. (2021). Accounting for risk. Foundations and Trends® in Accounting, 16(1-2), 1–135.
Penman, S. (2025). Empirical research on capitalizing intangible assets is logically incoherent. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4982366
Penman, S. H., & Yehuda, N. (2019). A matter of principle: Accounting reports convey both cash-flow news and discount-rate news. Review of Accounting Studies, 24(2), 684–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-018-9482-6
Penman, S. H., & Zhang, X. (2021). Connecting book rate of return to risk and return: The information conveyed by conservative accounting. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(1), 391–423.
Penman, S. H., & Zhang, X. (2025). Accounting for asset pricing factors. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 52(3), 1557–1584.
Penman, S. H., & Zhang, X. J. (2025). Building accounting-based asset pricing models that reflect the accounting: Conservatism and double-entry matter. Journal of Economic Theory, 210, 105614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2024.105614
Penman, S., & Yehuda, N. (2019). A matter of principle: The identification of cash-flow news and discount-rate news in financial statements. Management Science, 65(12), 5584–5602.
Penman, S., & Zhang, X. (2025). Deriving Fama and French factors. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4895017
Pope, C., Mays, N., & Popay, J. (2007). Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative health evidence: A guide to methods. Open University Press.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.
Yessica Amelia, Ngadi Permana, & Sarah Fitriyani. (2025). The Impact Of Tax Reforms On Stock Market Efficiency: A Study On Policy Changes And Market Dynamics. Indonesian Economic Review, 5(1), 01-11.
https://doi.org/10.53787/iconev.v5i1.39
Yulianti, G. & G. Ayu Utari. (2022). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Sektor Farmasi Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomika, 6(2), 386–403.
https://doi.org/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362218467
Zhang, X. (2000). Conservative accounting and equity valuation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(1), 125–149.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Studia Ekonomika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
KABA Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship (KBJME) is licensed under the International Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Articles in KABA Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship (KBJME) are Open Access articles published under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA License. This licence permits the use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non commercial purposes only, provided the work and orginal source are properly cited.
Any derivatives of the original must be distributed under the same license as the original.
